Choose Your Path

What you can try in the free demo

SecureCodingHub's interactive demo lets you experience the platform without an account. You'll find two complementary modes: Learn walks you through an attack scenario step by step so the vulnerability and its fix click before you write any code, while Practice drops you into a real code review challenge where you have to spot the vulnerable block, choose the correct mitigation, and confirm your reasoning.

Every challenge is reviewed against OWASP Top 10, OWASP API Top 10, OWASP Mobile Top 10, CWE Top 25, PCI DSS v4.0.1 requirement 6.2.2, and the EU Cyber Resilience Act secure-by-design expectations. The demo content is drawn from the same library used by engineering teams that train on our platform under their company account — what you see here is a representative sample, not a watered-down preview.

How the two modes differ

Learn mode is built for context. It reproduces a realistic attack — for example, an OTP brute-force against a login flow — and shows the request, the server response, the vulnerable handler, and the post-incident fix side by side. The pacing is reader-friendly: you advance when you're ready, not against a timer.

Practice mode is built for assessment. You see a snippet of production-style code in your preferred language, locate the vulnerability, and pick the right fix from a short list of plausible alternatives. The feedback explains why the other choices are insecure, so you leave with a sharper mental model — not just a correct answer.

Frequently asked questions

Do I need to create an account to try the demo?

No. The demo is fully accessible from this page and stores no personal data. If you want to track your progress across topics or assign learning paths to a team, that's where a SecureCodingHub account or company workspace comes in.

Which languages are covered?

The demo challenges are available in twelve languages spanning backend, frontend, mobile, and client-side stacks. The full platform expands to additional ecosystems and IDE integrations once you sign in.

Can I share the demo link with my team?

Yes. The demo runs in any modern browser and requires no install. Many security champions use the demo as a discussion starter in their next sprint review or lunch-and-learn before formally rolling out training.

Is the demo the same as the paid product?

The mechanics, content quality, and feedback engine are identical. The paid product adds progress tracking, SSO and SCIM provisioning, custom assignments, SCORM and xAPI exports, compliance reporting, and the full topic catalog covering 15+ vulnerability classes.

What you will learn in the demo session

The two demo challenges are deliberately chosen because they map to vulnerability classes most developers encounter on day one of a real codebase audit. The Learn-mode walkthrough uses an OTP brute-force scenario from OWASP API Top 10, which sits inside the broader authentication failures category — a single missing rate-limit on a login verification endpoint, the same shape that contributed to widely-reported credential-stuffing breaches in 2024 and 2025. The Practice-mode challenge drops you into an OWASP Web Top 10 SQL injection snippet in your preferred backend language, asks you to locate the vulnerable concatenation, and then forces you to pick between four plausible-looking remediations — only one of which is the parameterised query the framework actually expects.

Both challenges are deliberately short — under five minutes each — and built so that the feedback teaches as much as the correct answer. When you choose a wrong fix, the explanation distinguishes between mitigations that look reasonable on a slide (input validation, escaping, denylists) and the one architectural change that closes the vulnerability class. Developers who finish the two demos typically leave with a sharper internal heuristic for telling structural fixes apart from cosmetic ones, which is the same heuristic that determines whether real production patches hold up under fuzzing and code review.

How SecureCodingHub fits into a modern application security program

Most organisations buy developer security training to satisfy a specific control — PCI DSS v4.0.1 requirement 6.2.2, the EU Cyber Resilience Act's secure-by-design clauses, ISO/IEC 27001 Annex A.8.28, or an internal SOC 2 control mapping. The compliance bar is the entry condition, not the goal. The real outcome teams need is engineers who can read a diff in their own language and spot the class of mistake that turns a feature ship into a CVE. That outcome only comes from repeated, language-specific, hands-on practice — which is the gap our platform was built to close.

SecureCodingHub covers fifteen vulnerability classes across the full OWASP Top 10, the OWASP API Top 10, and the OWASP Mobile Top 10, plus dedicated tracks for client-side, supply chain, and AI-system threats. Every challenge is reviewed against the CWE Top 25 and PCI DSS v4 control mappings. For teams operating under regulated frameworks, our content alignment makes audit reporting straightforward, and our SCORM and xAPI export support means progress data flows back into your existing LMS without engineering work. For a fuller view of where developer training sits inside an AppSec program, our real cost of insecure code analysis walks through the cost model most security leaders actually use to justify the spend.

Self-hosted, single-sign-on, and dedicated-tenant deployments are available for organisations with data-residency or air-gap requirements. The platform supports SAML 2.0, OIDC, SCIM 2.0 user provisioning, and audit-log export to common SIEM destinations. If you are evaluating SecureCodingHub for a team larger than fifty engineers, our solutions team typically pairs the demo with a short architecture review to confirm the deployment model and integration requirements before any procurement step.

Language coverage and stack-aware delivery

Every challenge in the SecureCodingHub library is authored against the language and framework idioms developers actually use in production, not a synthetic pseudocode placeholder. The demo defaults to Java for the SQL injection Practice challenge, but the full platform delivers each challenge in twelve languages — JavaScript, TypeScript, Python, Java, Kotlin, Go, Ruby, PHP, C#, Swift, Rust, and Scala — selected automatically based on the learner's declared stack. A backend Java developer sees the JDBC pattern most likely to appear in their codebase; a frontend developer working in TypeScript sees the framework-specific equivalent. This stack-aware delivery is the difference between training that translates to real diffs and training that gets dismissed as "not how we write code here".

The same stack-awareness shapes the choice of remediation options. SQL injection in a Java Spring repository asks the learner to pick between PreparedStatement, named parameters in JdbcTemplate, JPA criteria queries, and a manually-escaped string concatenation — the menu reflects what the language actually offers. The Node.js Express variant offers ? placeholder binding, an ORM query builder, named-parameter syntax, and template-literal escaping. Each option is a remediation a real developer might consider; only one is the architectural fix that holds up across edge cases. The decision-making practice that produces real-world judgment comes from being forced to discriminate between plausible options in your own stack — not from picking the "correct" answer from a generic checklist.

Mobile and client-side coverage extends to Swift and Kotlin for native iOS and Android development, plus a dedicated WebView-bridge track that addresses the cross-stack vulnerabilities most mobile teams overlook. Supply chain, prompt injection, and AI-system tracks pull from the same content engine and adapt their challenge presentation to the relevant ecosystem — npm and PyPI for software composition analysis examples, the OpenAI and Anthropic API patterns for prompt-injection scenarios, and so on. The architectural decision behind this coverage is that "secure coding" only sticks when the example code is recognisable to the reader as code they would write themselves.

Continue exploring

If the demo sparked a question about a specific class of vulnerability, our vulnerability guides cover each OWASP topic in detail with code examples in twelve languages, and our engineering blog goes deeper on tooling — secret scanning, software composition analysis, secure code review practice, and the DevSecOps integration patterns that keep training value compounding inside a real pipeline. For teams ready to roll out structured training, the enterprise page outlines the workspace tiers and the LMS-integration options each deployment model includes.